HLF resurrection! It's true! It's alive!
#122 Posted 29 August 2009 - 07:10 PM
Edit: I'm gonna get me a new siggy for these glorious moments.
The Scotsman - Moderator Emeritus
#126 Posted 30 August 2009 - 03:04 AM
Either that or anyone who's been here since . . . say, 2006?
That way when our website becomes glorious again we can look at each other and say, "Heh. We're awesome for being on a wesbite for WAY too long."
Edit: Bad idea is bad.
Actually, I like the idea itself because I like seniority in a community. But instead of a veteran tag or something, I propose we get to decide what goes under our username, because 50 people can't be "G-Man Personal Aid".
#127 Posted 30 August 2009 - 03:25 AM
By seniority, you mean "people in charge"...and that's what the "names in red" are for, not random people who have a certain number of posts, or a certain join date.
Instead, a select few, as many as needed, to make sure that everything is going according to plan (yeah, no, nobody actually has a copy of that plan), and these few should be chosen on merits, for their capacity to be responsible and not complete *******tards.
A Vvaardenfell sunset
Ivan the Space Biker's Personal Aid
#130 Posted 30 August 2009 - 04:27 AM
bad idea, it would create animosity between new & old and not soo old members. I suggest we just keep given the normal tags per post count, then after x amount, you get to choose from a select variety of tags.
The Greatest Man Alive
#131 Posted 30 August 2009 - 04:28 AM
#132 Posted 30 August 2009 - 05:23 AM
Yes atleast that, because I'm tired of being G-man's Personal Aid
#133 Posted 30 August 2009 - 05:27 AM
Of course, why would I leave?
This is true which is why we would never implement something like that. This plan sounds like a good one though sui, recommend it sir.